Friday, April 10, 2015

Embedded Task 4 - Reflection on Presentation tools

Greetings,

This week we focused on the application of useful presentation technologies like PowerPoint, Prezi, Glogster and Thinglink. Although all have interesting uses and merits I focused my attention to the use of PowerPoint, as in the past I viewed it as a tool predominantly created for and by teachers. Although in the past I have witnessed students regularly use PowerPoint, it is usually only as a tokenistic visual aid during oral presentations. This week’s content clearly demonstrated creative ways in which students can gain and dispense information through the program.
One idea that I found particularly interesting was the creation of a Virtual Museum through Powerpoint. This activity is highly visual and interactive and quite easy to create. In the context of a classroom I believe it could be used effectively by students to create and collaborate with their peers, whilst giving teachers a chance to assess the knowledge and understanding of students. If I were running the activity I would scaffold by providing students with a template of a Virtual Museum PowerPoint and demonstrate how to customize and use the program. Students could then be given a topic in which they had to create six displays on a given topic. Based on the time given and assessment goals students could be give specific details in what to include. Perhaps they would need to add images, audio, and video to the museum display. The students would then become curators and have to decide what was relevant and useful in their display. Once completed students would upload their creations to a wiki to allow other students the opportunity to interact with the virtual museum. If students had been given the same topic they could be asked to look at a few presentations and decide what information and topics were deemed most relevant. If students had different topics they could compare and contrast the similarities and differences in content. For example, their presentation could have been based around different prominent Indigenous groups. Students could then contrast and synthesize the commonalities and differences.


I believe this technology allows for the application of both SAMR and Bloom’s Taxonomy.  In terms of SAMR, it has taken a basic presentation tool and allowed students the opportunity to create valuable content that is informative to all students and allows for a variety of perspectives. It also encourages collaboration between students and activates higher order thinking skills. This resource can then be easily accessed by students as a source for information and collaboration. It is also a useful tool for teachers in terms of summative and formative assessment. PowerPoint is here to stay.

No comments:

Post a Comment